Difference between revisions of "About HECS"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
=== Orientations of the HECS === | === Orientations of the HECS === | ||
| − | As part of BOARC’s wider project | + | As part of BOARC’s wider project, the Heritage Education Centre (HECS) is dedicated to critically exploring the history of the building, the surrounding area, and the global networks of transit, exploration and extraction made possible by science in the British Empire. |
| − | |||
| + | Bidston's imbrication in the history of maritime trade and the British Empire calls for dedicated research into the ethical, contextual and expanded forms of visual culture, and museum and curatorial practice, which would support these histories. | ||
| + | HECS looks to engage in the complexity of visual cultures necessary to address the critical enquiry into nineteenth century British history. Part of HECS’ remit is to ask questions such as: How can a local museum reflect contemporary post-colonial discourse at the intersection of art and science? And: How might it be possible to situate this dialogue within scholarly and museological debate, at the same time as responding to this location and demand from communities which surround it? | ||
<p/> | <p/> | ||
Revision as of 08:51, 17 April 2022
The Heritage Education Centre Space is Open / HECS is ajar!
This wiki is a space for testing out ideas for the Heritage Education Centre Space (HECS) that is unfolding. HECS is not quite yet open, so we use: ajar. Open means: open for construction. Open for contributions, participation. Ajar means: there will be some effort and energy involved to open up the space, we welcome and are grateful for the involvement, and the parameters of this are not yet fixed. HECS is one part of Bidston Observatory Artistic Research Centre.
Orientations of the HECS
As part of BOARC’s wider project, the Heritage Education Centre (HECS) is dedicated to critically exploring the history of the building, the surrounding area, and the global networks of transit, exploration and extraction made possible by science in the British Empire.
Bidston's imbrication in the history of maritime trade and the British Empire calls for dedicated research into the ethical, contextual and expanded forms of visual culture, and museum and curatorial practice, which would support these histories.
HECS looks to engage in the complexity of visual cultures necessary to address the critical enquiry into nineteenth century British history. Part of HECS’ remit is to ask questions such as: How can a local museum reflect contemporary post-colonial discourse at the intersection of art and science? And: How might it be possible to situate this dialogue within scholarly and museological debate, at the same time as responding to this location and demand from communities which surround it?
The HECS documents spaces, objects and instruments related to the Bidston Observatory on the Wirral, Merseyside, UK. Most of the usual tales being told and retold about the observatory celebrate a succession of White British male scientists and their great inventions. HECS tries to make space for accounts that are extra to nation state, normative ideas of progress and the advancement of Science. The practice of observation, operating scientific instruments and investment in observatories is entangled with different scales of capitalist endeavour, colonialist and imperialist modes of worlding. The Bidston Observatory is connected to such modes through its contributions to the maritime industry, natural earth sciences and oceonography. HECS interrogates different instrumentations and approaches in these historically defined disciplines at various scales. It is a place to articulate these connections, and the responsibilities they bring. HECS gathers facts about the building itself, the artefacts and instruments that it once housed and still houses, but tries to connect them to larger histories and futures. No histories are told without bias, and so are the stories in this wiki.
Questions
These are some of the questions that came up while we are trying to imagine to build the HECS in discussion with many others. Please feel welcome to add questions, or to rephrase the ones below.
- How to contextualise The Bidston Observatory? As a colonial apparatus, as ...
- How can our understandings of the site and its histories not reproduce colonial relationships and patterns?
- Are the instruments at the site usuable, dead, or a mix of both? How can their active use and application be a part of artistic research in the present?
- How do the instruments at Bidston today relate to replicas, originals or other versions of the same technologies?
- How can damage to the site and related objects be rethought? What repair skills – conceptual and mechanical – can contributors bring?
- What ways of thinking or practices could be hospiced into disappearance rather than repaired?
- What does it mean to accumulate a collection, in a site like this? For a project like BOARC?
- What defines a museum? What counts as heritage?
- Can this wiki document the absences and traces at Bidston Observatory?
- How does the space of Bidston reflect its intended uses? How can Bidston and its 'contents' be repurposed?
- How can the wiki include views from different people impacted by colonialism and its legacies? By disgruntled historians of science, astronomy, and oceanography? By the local community?
- Can the entries here archive aspects of how knowledge has been made and structured, now and in the past?
- How can the wiki address archival sources in ways that read them both against and along the grain of their original purposes?
- How is instrumentation linked to slavery?
- How to take the wider implications of observation into account?
